Skip to main content
Trust & Ethics

For Investors

You can't run a real test on a founder before you bet on them. We run it from how they already show up.

Most founder bets get made on pitch, reference calls, and pattern matching across hundreds of decks. Readiness Engine reads how the founder actually shows up — in board updates, exec interviews, town halls — and tells you what they can carry through the stretch you're underwriting. So the next entry in your anti-portfolio isn't another one that keeps you up at night.

The Risk You're Not Measuring

65%

Harvard Business Review research shows that 65 % of startups fail due to people-related issues, and the founding team is the single greatest factor in venture success or failure.

Yet the industry still lacks a standardized way to assess how the humans behind the pitch deck will perform in VUCA conditions — the volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity that define the startup journey.

The best founders don't always come from Stanford or Y Combinator. They come from everywhere. But pattern-matching to pedigree means you're systematically overlooking the founders most likely to outperform — because they don't fit the template.

Readiness Engine™ evaluates capacity, not credentials.

The Next Decade of Founder Risk

The founders you back today will build companies around AI agents tomorrow.

The founder who thrived in 2020 is not the founder who thrives in 2028. The next decade demands leaders who can absorb disruption, delegate intelligently to AI systems, and hold team trust through fundamental workflow change.

Those capacities don't show up on a pitch deck or a reference call — but they do show up in how founders reason, adapt, and communicate in real work.

Readiness Engine™ surfaces whether your founders have the developmental capacity to lead what's coming — before you write the check.

The Founder Readiness Level℠

Purpose-built for VCs and investors evaluating founder capacity to execute in high-uncertainty environments. Readiness Engine™ assesses the constructs that matter most for venture success: decision-making under pressure, adaptive capacity when markets shift, team communication and resilience, and the ability to balance conviction with flexibility. Outputs are built for investment committees and LP updates, surfacing who to back, coach, or slow down.

Structured Video Assessment

A structured, one-way video evaluation administered online. Captures how a founder reasons through uncertainty, communicates under pressure, and articulates strategic pivots — scored against the construct set configured for founder evaluation, with no interviewer bias.

Existing Content Analysis

Already have pitch recordings, founder interviews, or demo day presentations? Readiness Engine™ can analyze existing artifacts to generate a readiness profile — no additional time required from the founder.

How It Works

Whether you choose the video assessment or content analysis, the process is designed to deliver actionable insights without disrupting your due diligence workflow.

1

Select a Package

Choose the level of insight you need based on your investment stage and timeline.

2

We Administer Readiness Engine™

Founders complete scenario-based questions or we analyze existing content—evaluated against the readiness constructs configured for founder-stage decisions.

3

Receive the Readout

Get a comprehensive founder readiness profile benchmarked across decision-making, adaptability, communication, and execution capacity.

4

Optional: Coaching & Development

Access targeted coaching to develop the founders you're backing and maximize your portfolio's success potential.

The Charismatic Founder Who Couldn't Scale

Challenge

A seed-stage VC was evaluating a $2M investment in a B2B SaaS startup. The founder was magnetic in the pitch—articulate, confident, experienced. References were glowing. The product had early traction.

Assessment

The lead partner requested a Readiness Engine assessment as part of diligence. The evaluation revealed:

  • High scores on vision and external communication
  • Low scores on coachability and feedback integration
  • Pattern: The founder reframed every critique as external misunderstanding rather than considering alternative perspectives

Outcome

The VC passed on the deal. The founder raised from another firm. 14 months later:

  • • The startup burned through $1.8M
  • • The founding team fractured (2 co-founders left)
  • • The board forced a CEO transition
  • • The company eventually shut down

The VC who passed used the assessment data to articulate their concerns to LPs—demonstrating disciplined, data-driven diligence even when the pitch was compelling.

Impact

  • • Avoided a $2M loss
  • • Protected fund returns and LP confidence
  • • Validated the importance of founder capacity assessment in the diligence process

The optional multiplier

What changes when you add coaching.

The assessment identifies where a founder stands developmentally and where the growth edge sits. Coaching turns that picture into movement — pairing a certified practitioner with the founder to work directly at the developmental level the profile names. For portfolios choosing to pair coaching with the assessment, engagements typically run 12–18 months and close with a reassessment that shows what shifted at the developmental level — so the partnership has evidence of what the support produced, not just an impression.

Book a call

Learn More About Readiness Engine™

See how Readiness Engine™ helps investors make better decisions about the people behind the pitch deck.

What Is the Estimated ROI?

See how reducing founder risk impacts your portfolio returns.

Illustrative · Self-Assessment Tool

Founder Success ROI Estimator

A what-if calculator. Plug in your fund's numbers and your own assumption about how many people-related failures could be avoided with sharper diligence on senior leaders. The math is conditional on your input — not a Readiness Engine promise.

Failure rates drawn from Wasserman (HBR, 2008) and CB Insights startup post-mortem analyses. All outputs in the right panel are conditional on YOUR “failures prevented” assumption and YOUR fund inputs. They are illustrative estimates, not guarantees, projections, or financial advice. Readiness Engine provides structured developmental data to inform senior people decisions; we do not guarantee specific outcomes, returns, or failure-rate changes. Not a clinical assessment, psychological evaluation, or investment advice.

Input Variables

1. Fund Context

2. Portfolio Loss Profile

Per Wasserman (HBR, 2008), ~65% of startup failures trace to people / team dynamics, not strategy or product.

3. Your Assumption + Program Sizing

How many of the people-related failures above do you think sharper senior-leader diligence could realistically avoid? This number is your assumption — all outputs in the right panel are conditional on it.

Impact Analysis

All outputs conditional on your inputs.

Total Invested per Company (Avg)

$3,500,000

People-Related Failures (Expected)

6.6

Estimated Capital at Risk

$23,100,000

Capital You'd Save (per your assumption)

$7,000,000

Cost of Assessment Program (Total)

$200,000

Net Impact (per your assumption)

$6,800,000

ROI Multiple (illustrative)

34.0x

Implied Failure-Rate Reduction (per your input)

20.0%

What this means

Better data on senior people decisions reduces variance in how you evaluate founders. Readiness Engine sharpens the input. We don't guarantee the output — the math above shows what the savings would look like IF your assumption holds.